Service · Physical AI

The intelligence layer for machines — we build judgment, not robots.

We build the software intelligence layer of physical AI: LLM planning over your machine fleets, telemetry pipelines, predictive maintenance, and the evaluation gates that keep autonomous behavior inside limits you set. Your hardware and integrators stay.

Judgment, not robots One accountable lead Every action gated

The physical AI stack — our boundary, in writing

04  Governance & assurance US
03  Planning & intelligence US
02  Perception data & telemetry US
OUR BOUNDARY
01  Hardware & actuation YOUR VENDORS

What is physical AI

In software, a bad output is a ticket. In the physical world, it has a blast radius.

Physical AI is AI whose output is an action, not an answer — software that senses, decides, and executes through machines. Because its mistakes land in the physical world, it's as much an evaluation and safety problem as a modeling one.

The machines are deployed and the new models are being pointed at them. What hasn't caught up is the discipline. Point an 80%-failure rate at production lines and the economics invert — the evaluation gate becomes the difference between a deployment and an incident report. That layer is our entire scope.

4M+

Industrial robots in operation worldwide — already deployed, now being pointed at new models.

IFR World Robotics · verified Jun 2026

>80%

AI project failure rate in the purely digital world — where a mistake is only a ticket.

RAND Corporation · verified Jun 2026

What we build

The software intelligence layer, end to end.

Each offering carries its stack-layer tag — so you see exactly where our work stops and your hardware vendors' begins.

LAYER 03

LLM & agent planning

The judgment layer over your machines — instruction parsing, task decomposition, and human approval gates on every consequential action. Agentic AI with its hands bound until evals say otherwise.

LAYER 02

Perception-data & telemetry pipelines

Sensor streams, fleet telemetry, and machine logs made model-ready — the unglamorous plumbing every planning layer stands on.

LAYER 03

Predictive maintenance

Failure prediction built from the telemetry your equipment already emits — from your data as it is, not a sensor retrofit.

LAYER 04

Evaluation harnesses & safety gates

Evals before actuation: golden scenario sets, regression suites, and staged-autonomy gates — the discipline that held a 200+ location chain at zero critical defects across four years.

LAYER 03

Digital-twin software & simulation plumbing

State models, twin dashboards, and the data interfaces that feed simulation — we build the mirror and its plumbing, not the physics engine.

LAYER 04

Governance for systems that act

The Responsible AI layer where blast radius makes it non-optional — acceptable-action policy, named owners, audit trails, institutionalized through an AI Center of Excellence when you're ready.

Actuation Gated

Nothing reaches actuation ungated. Over 80% of AI projects fail in the digital world. Point that at machines and the eval gate and decision audit trail are the difference between a deployment and an incident report.

The autonomy gate

How an LLM is allowed to touch a machine.

Autonomy is climbed, never granted — each promotion earned with evaluation evidence and a named human sign-off.

RUNG 01

Shadow

Runs against live telemetry and logs what it would have done, compared daily against your operators. Disagreements become eval cases, not incidents.

Output: the model watches · actuates nothing

RUNG 02

Suggest

The system proposes; your people dispose. Acceptance rate, overrides, and near-miss flags become the evidence file that justifies (or blocks) the next rung.

Output: recommendations to a human operator

RUNG 03

Approve

The model plans multi-step work; every consequential action waits on a human-in-the-loop approval. Latency drops, control doesn't.

Output: the model plans · a human approves each action

RUNG 04

Act, with audit

Autonomous action inside hard limits — bounded scopes, rate caps, kill-switches, an audit trail with a named owner. The rung most vendors start at; the rung we finish at.

Output: bounded autonomy · kill-switch · named owner

Our controls map to SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and ISO/IEC 42001:2023, with NIST's AI RMF and the EU AI Act as targets where they apply. Functional-safety standards for the machines — IEC 61508, ISO 10218 — stay with your safety engineers; our layer produces the evaluation evidence their certification consumes.

Why a software lab

Why a software lab belongs in the machine world.

01

Responsible AI is the founding charter. Governance for blast-radius systems is the reason the lab exists. When the output is an action, it stops being philosophy and becomes scope.

02

We claim only the layer we own. A boundary drawn in writing. A vendor who claims the robot, the AI, and the cloud is overclaiming at least one.

03

Aegis AI delivery discipline. Evals before actuation, staged rollouts, production monitoring — the Aegis AI process where a regression costs downtime, not tickets.

04

The people stay in the loop. Operators and engineers get trained and kept in the decision path — our Human-Led AI practice, not an afterthought.

Track record

Our physical-AI record, stated precisely.

We haven't shipped a robot, and this page won't pretend otherwise. What we have is the record that transfers — production software the physical-equipment economy trusted with real money.

A Stanford-rooted Responsible AI lab, founded 2011, run by founder Kelvin Tran. Bring the machines; we'll bring the judgment layer. When a use case shouldn't be autonomous, we'll tell you — which a vendor paid to ship robots won't.

Heavy equipment marketplace · acquired 2017

YardClub — the software layer under heavy machinery. A contractor-to-contractor marketplace for excavators and loaders. We built the listings, payments, and transaction infrastructure end to end; it processed $120M+ before Caterpillar acquired it. Exactly the layer every physical AI deployment needs underneath it.

Software running physical operations

BJ's Restaurants — 200+ locations. We kept a software-critical multi-site operation shipping twice a week for four years with zero critical defects — the eval-and-staged-rollout discipline the autonomy gate is built on.

How it runs

How a physical AI engagement works.

Five stages, the boundary contract first — because two vendors who each think the other owns the gap is how this domain fails.

STAGE 01

Scope the layer

What hardware exists, what software we own, where the interfaces sit — written down before anything is built, including the use cases we'd advise against.

Output: boundary contract + ranked use cases

STAGE 02

Ground in telemetry

An audit of what your machines already emit versus what the planning layer needs — most fleets log more ground truth than anyone has structured.

Output: data baseline + gap map

STAGE 03

Build behind the gate

The intelligence layer and its evaluation harness ship as one deliverable — golden scenarios, regression suites, gate logic. Nothing reaches actuation ungated.

Output: planning layer + eval harness, together

STAGE 04

Stage the autonomy

The system climbs the autonomy gate one rung at a time, each promotion backed by eval evidence and signed by the operations owner who lives with the consequences.

Output: rung-by-rung promotion, signed

STAGE 05

Operate & hand over

Drift detection, incident playbooks, and operator training — your team learns to read the evals and run the gates. Stay on retainer or take the keys.

Output: monitoring + a team that runs it

Where it pays first

Five places the intelligence layer pays first.

Industrial manufacturing & process plants

Agent planning over production data and predictive maintenance from the telemetry your lines already emit — every recommendation gated.

Logistics, warehousing & fulfillment

The physical backbone of ecommerce: AMR fleet coordination, exception triage, and slotting intelligence over robots your integrator installed.

Energy & field operations

Inspection-data intelligence, field-service copilots, and maintenance prioritization where a missed signal is measured in outages.

Construction & heavy equipment

Fleet telemetry, utilization intelligence, and equipment-marketplace systems — where our field record above was earned.

Food-service & multi-site operations

Software running physical operations at scale is home turf — we kept BJ's Restaurants (200+ locations) shipping twice a week for four years with zero critical defects.

Questions buyers ask before they build.

What is a physical AI company — and which kind is Silicon Prime?+
Two kinds share the label: companies that build the machines, and companies that build the intelligence directing them. Silicon Prime is the second — we engineer the planning, data, evaluation, and governance software that decides what a machine should do and proves it's safe before it acts. Your robots, sensors, and integrators stay where they are; our work sits above them.
Do you build robots or hardware?+
No — and we put that in writing on this page. No robot hardware, actuators, firmware, sensor design, or motion control. We build the software intelligence layer above your hardware vendors and integrators, coordinating at the interfaces. If what you need is a machine built, we're the wrong vendor and we'll say so on the first call.
How can an LLM safely control a physical system?+
By never letting it start in control. Our systems climb a four-rung autonomy gate — shadow, suggest, approve, act — where each promotion requires evaluation evidence from your real operations and a named human sign-off. Hard limits, kill-switches, and audit trails bound the top rung. Most deployments should sit at rungs two and three far longer than demos suggest.
What data do we need before this is feasible?+
Less than you fear, but it must be grounded: the telemetry, logs, and maintenance records your equipment already produces are usually enough to start. Stage two audits exactly what exists against what the use case needs, before you spend on new sensors. The common gap isn't missing data — it's telemetry nobody ever structured for models.
How do you handle safety standards and liability?+
By respecting the division of labor. Functional safety for the machines — IEC 61508, ISO 10218, emergency stops, certified interlocks — stays with your safety engineers and equipment vendors. Our layer maps to SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST's AI RMF, and the EU AI Act, and produces the evaluation evidence and audit trail your safety case consumes.
Who owns the code, models, and IP?+
You do — every pipeline, planning layer, eval suite, and dashboard transfers under full work-for-hire IP assignment signed at kickoff. The one exception is our underlying Aegis AI methodology, which is patent-pending and licensed to you for use within your organization. Your machine data never leaves the boundary you set; we work inside your cloud tenant under your access controls.
What does it cost, and how long does it take?+
Fixed scope, one accountable lead, and steady state in 4–8 weeks per phase — the boundary contract and telemetry audit first, the planning layer and eval harness next, autonomy staged after. Build costs follow our published cost guide; run costs are driven by data volume and modeled before we build, not discovered on an invoice.

Thirty minutes · no pitch deck

Have machines that need better judgment?

Bring your fleet, your telemetry, and the workflow you wish ran itself — we'll tell you honestly which layer is ours, which belongs to your hardware vendors, and what the first gated deployment looks like.

Book a 30-min scoping call → Email us